5 greatest unsolved enigmas of humanity

Shroud of TurinThe following article unfolds some mysteries of the world, containing five of the most puzzling and unexplained findings in the history of mankind…

1. The Bimini Road

In 1968 under the seabed, close to the coast of Bimini in the Bahamas islands, dozens of huge flat stones of limestone were discovered. At first glance, there was nothing surprising. However, scientists were troubled because these stones formed a perfectly straight boulevard one km long that appeared unlikely to be created by nature.

Many said that those were the ruins of an ancient world civilization, others were convinced that that was a unique natural phenomenon. However, none of them can ignore a prophecy made in the early decades of the twentieth century.

A famous prophet and healer of that time, Edgar Cayce, made the following prediction in 1938: “A part of the ruins of the Lost Atlantis will be discovered in the sea around the islands of Bimini… It will happen in 1968 or 1968“.

There were others who have claimed to have seen pyramids and ruins of buildings on the sea floor near Bimini, but the only confirmed finding is the Bimini Road, which still troubles scientists about its origin and its connection to a human creation of the past.

2. The Voynich Manuscript

The Voynich Manuscript was named after it was discovered in 1912 in an Italian monastery. Perhaps, it is the most mysterious book in world history. This is a book of mysterious pictorial content written in an incomprehensible language. Scientists estimate that it was written centuries ago (approximately 400 to 800 years ago) by an unknown author who used an unknown writing code.

From its pages, it is possible to understand only that it served as a pharmacy book (it appears to describe aspects of medieval and early medicine), as well as an astronomical and cosmological map. Even stranger than the writing language are the images of unknown plants, cosmological charts and strange pictures of naked women in a green liquid.

Dozens cryptanalysts, scholars and scientists have tried to translate it but to no avail. Many came to the conclusion that in fact it is an elaborate hoax, that the encrypted words are random and mean nothing, and that the unorthodox images belong exclusively to the realm of fantasy.

Today the Voynich Manuscript is in the Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library at Yale University, and nobody so far has managed to decipher a word.

3. The Piri Reis Map

The Piri Reis map was accidentally discovered in 1929 in a museum in Turkey and since then no logical explanation for its illustrations was found.

In approximate dimensions of 60 × 86 cm, the Turkish admiral Piri Reis designed in 1513 the map of the world which included Portugal, Spain, West Africa, Central and South Atlantic, the Caribbean, the eastern half of South America and a part of Antarctica.

The missing countries are not actually missing because in the original manuscripts Piri Reis assures us that he had designed also the North America and the rest of the eastern half of the world in the pieces of the map that were probably destroyed over the years.

The point is that this map is so accurate in detail that it raises a question: how could an admiral of the 16th century design the entire Earth without the possibility of aerial observation? How is it possible to separate the continents and coasts in their correct distances without the knowledge of the method of Azimuthal projection or spherical trigonometry required for mapping? And how did he design the Antarctic that had not been officially discovered at that time?

4. The Nazca Lines

The geoglyphs of the Nazca culture located in Peru are among the world’s biggest mysteries both because of the manner as for the reason of their creation. These are approximately 13,000 lines forming 800 designs covering an area of 450 square kilometers. They were created approximately between 500 BC and 500 AD and look as if they had been designed by a giant hand.

These lines form shapes, animals, plants and geometric designs and the strange thing is that they virtually have no actual construction purpose, since they are visible only from the sky. Scientists estimate that perhaps the Nazca had in possession a large hot air balloon or kite that helped them design.

Many say that this is an airstrip built for aliens. Others go even further, saying that the lines are designed by aliens. Some believe that 2000 years ago giants lived on Earth. More popular (and more plausible) explanation is that the Nazca made these designs for their gods in the sky, but no theory has been confirmed to date.

5. The Shroud of Turin

Although the Vatican has affirmed that it is not authentic, the Holy Shroud remains an unsolved mystery of humanity. It is a shroud on which is imprinted the image of a bearded 33 years old man. Throughout the fabric there are signs of blood, which proves that this man was crucified and then his body was covered with this cloth. Understandably, many believe it is the burial cloth of Jesus Christ in which the body was put after the Crucifixion, as the weave of the fabric refers to the epoch he lived in and the signs of blood confirm the death in the same manner as that of Christ.

Some other scientists contend that it was created much later, between 13th and 14th century. Even if it is a coincidence and not the burial cloth of Christ, the mystery remains: what has become of the real shroud that covered his body after the Crucifixion?

The following two tabs change content below.
Anna LeMind

Anna LeMind

Hi, I like learning new things and sharing my knowledge with others! I post science, psychology, self improvement and other related topics. I'm particularly interested in topics concerning consciousness and subconscious, perception, human mind's potential, as well as the nature of reality and the universe.
Anna LeMind

About Anna LeMind

Hi, I like learning new things and sharing my knowledge with others! I post science, psychology, self improvement and other related topics. I'm particularly interested in topics concerning consciousness and subconscious, perception, human mind's potential, as well as the nature of reality and the universe.
Bookmark the permalink.

15 Comments

  1. About number 5: the Shroud.

    How is it a 33 year old man? That is impossible to determine. Not sure about the weave of the cloth remark as well. Definitely dated later than it was originally thought to have been made or created; definitely a fake. And an original shroud? Probably never existed. The Jesus character may have been another man who followers and adherent’s deified by plagiarizing older religions, in particular, Mithraism. And if Jesus did exist, there is a high probability that he did not die on the cross and that he was just as human as Noah, Abraham, Moses and Muhammad and you or I. No real mysteries there, sorry.

  2. As a reader of the bible i say the shroud is a clear fake. The bible [Isaiah] describes Jesus as having no particular features that would stand out and make us notice him. That he was “weak and spindly”. He wasn’t this stud looking character in all of our paintings. The guy in the shroud is clearly a large man with bold features. NOT Jesus.

  3. this is very interesting article

  4. The Shroud of Turin is a fake, and it’s been scientifically proven. The cloth material was carbon dated to be from around 1200-1300 AD, the stuff that makes up the negative image was tested and is basically a form of paint from the 1300’s, AND the shroud does not in any way reflect the Jewish burial rituals of that time– bodies were cleaned and then wrapped in strips of cloth with the face covered by a small square piece (this is actually mentioned in the Bible as well). All this research was done by reputable scientists and anthropologists, and it was concluded that the Shroud was fabricated around 1300 AD as a way to bring people to a certain church (I can’t remember the name of it, but they even found documentation of the church being told, by the pope of the time, to explain that it was an artistic rendering of the real Shroud, but no one really paid attention to this). So, really, the Shroud of Turin shouldn’t be on this list.
    The rest of them sound pretty interesting though :)

  5. nice post I like the article

  6. On number 5.

    1. What makes them think that the man is 33?

    2. Having blood on it does NOT prove that the man was crucified. Human beings don’t bleed exclusively when nailed to a cross, there are other scenarios that could have caused the blood.

    4. Weave patterns aren’t evidence of when it came from, at least in my eyes. Is it physically impossible to weave that same pattern today? If not, it proves nothing.

    3. “…what has become of the real shroud that covered his body after the Crucifixion?”
    Spoiler Alert… There probably isn’t a real shroud, because there probably isn’t a real Jesus. You’d be better off trying to find Excalibur or the Holy Grail.

  7. Can i just make one point about the map that seems to have been over looked ..The map shows the coastline of Antarctica perfectly even though it is covered by (in some places) over a mile of ice.Something that couldn’t be replicated until the age of satellites and infra red imaging..Mmmmm makes you think doesn’t it

  8. Number 3, the Piri Reis map article, is misleading.

    In his manuscripts, Reis mentions that he used Colombus’ maps, as well as other sources including Arabic and Indian maps.

    He didn’t design anything, so much as compile diverse sources into a more complete one.

  9. you know, some of you guys think youre so smart, when really you base your opinions off of one of dozens of other opinions and tests. Well, for one, jesus WAS just another man, just like moses and abraham. and thats exactly how we need to see him. A man. who, by the will of god, sought to teach man how to live properly, instead of living under the tom-foolery in which the roman pagans were instituting. jesus became a godly man, and god looked upon him with great pride and dignity, and seeing as though, no other man at the time was as innocent and humble as him, he was used as the great sacrifice for your sins.. so you can go ahead and drink and party and live a secular life and believe there’s no life after death. but id rather believe and find out there isnt, then not believe and find out there is..

  10. Annd, referring to my comment above, the paintings of Jesus that we see now, are all forgeries. The thin-haired, slim-faced, Caucasian man we see, is actually a man named Cesare Borgia, the second son of pope Alexander. when he took his title in Italy as a supreme commander a number of troops, he forced all the painting of the REAL Jesus into the likeness of him. which of course did not upset the closely related pope, mainly because the papacy and Catholicism was literally introduced to sway christian from the real scriptures, so anything dealing with getting away from the real scriptures, satan made happen.

  11. Can none of you read? The first line of number 5 ” the Vatican has affirmed that it is not authentic”.
    And jonathan dickson, look up the definition of “forgery”. They may not be paintings of the real Jesus, (of course they’re not. The artists that painted them had no idea what he really looked like) but, they are not forgeries.

  12. The figure on the Shroud of Turin look very much like a figure on a memory tombstone not far from where i live in Flanders, Belgium. That stone is on the outside wall of a church and portrait a knight in the mid ages who lived there. His arms are bended in the same way, he also has a beard and look the same. So yes althou i am a Katholic i believe this Shroud is from the mid ages and from West Europe, probably the Flemish region.

  13. The shroud of Turin isn’t disputed, it under went carbon dating under permission of the church and was proved (and it is not contended) to be from the 13-14th century. And signs of blood in no way proves that the man (if it was a man) does not prove a Crucifixion.

  14. The Voynich Manuscript really isn’t as elusive as all that. It’s probably just a language that had not been written down before, and has since died out or transferred to a modern script, such as a Latinized or Arabic one, as explained in this wonderful video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpZD_3D8_WQ

  15. No. 5 is false. The Vatican has not “affirmed it is not authentic” (while they haven’t affirmed it IS authentic, either). In fact, the Catholic Church is the owner of the shroud and puts it on display for veneration every few years. Furthermore, the carbon dating purporting to show the shroud is from the Middle Ages was shown to have been done on a piece of the fabric that was added as a patch after the shroud was damaged in a fire around the 13th century. After this mistake was realized, the shroud was dated again and shown to indeed be from the 1st century.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Enter the text from the image below
 

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>