New research has opened up questions that it may be possible to lose your empathetic ability over time or that it could even possibly be increased through training.

These questions were raised because scientists have recently discovered they can physically see people’s empathetic ability on brain scans.

This research has added a great deal of information to the neuroscience field relating to emotion and has opened up questions with regards to two areas of empathy in particular: affective empathy and cognitive empathy.

Compared to people who have a logical reaction to people’s emotions, empathetic people, or those with a strong emotional reaction to others, are found to have denser grey matter in specific areas of the brain.

Researchers at Monash University [1] hypothesised that through looking at images of the brain, they would be able to predict where individuals scored on the affective/cognitive empathy scale based on their neurological structures.

A co-author of the study, Robert Eres, explained [2] that “people who are high on affective empathy are often those who get quite fearful when watching a scary movie, or start crying during a sad scene. Those who have a high cognitive empathy are those who are more rational, for example, a clinical psychologist counselling a client.”

The researchers carried out a study of 176 people who took part in a neuroimaging procedure known as voxel-based morphometry which analyzes the density of grey matter in any specific area of the brain. Before undergoing the imaging procedure, the individuals were given a questionnaire to determine their levels of empathy.

The results proved their hypothesis, however, since they found that the part in the centre of the brain named the insular cortex, the part of the brain that controls strong emotions, contained denser grey matter in those who were said to have high affective empathy whereas the participants who scored high on the cognitive empathy had denser grey matter in an area of the brain called the midcingulate cortex and the adjacent dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, which is just above the connection of the two hemispheres. These findings prove that empathy may be represented by brain structures and cell populations.

This recent development of visible empathy raises plenty of questions as to whether this area of personality can be purposefully adapted and altered. These particular researchers, along with many more I’m sure, hope to study this area further, in particular, the element of causation in future studies.

References

  1. http://www.sciencedirect.com
  2. http://monash.edu

Copyright © 2012-2024 Learning Mind. All rights reserved. For permission to reprint, contact us.

power of misfits book banner desktop

Like what you are reading? Subscribe to our newsletter to make sure you don’t miss new thought-provoking articles!

This Post Has 5 Comments

  1. Joseph Nardone

    This is an interesting study but has this study been used on violent, racist, bigoted people? Have the researchers gone into a prison where very dangerous and violent criminals are incarcerated, such a Pelican Bay in California, where criminals are incarcerated who committed crimes in other prisons are imprisoned here as punishment for their crimes? Would the researchers find increased gray matter in other parts of the brain leading to the same hypothesis concerning violence? To me, this would be the perfect population because the behavior of the subjects is definitely known or they would not be in Pelican Bay and there is a larger population and not pre-testing would be needed. Simply review the persons rap sheet. That’s what I would like to see.

    1. Emma

      I too, would like to see this study done on extremely dangerous prisoners. Not for entertainment, but because some of them are sociopaths. Those who “get off” on other peoples pain and suffering compared to those who may have absolutely no emotion towards their victims.

  2. ian

    Hi Christina, thanks for sharing this update. An interesting study- certainly as Joseph and Emma suggest the horizons of the study need expanding, but early data is quite stimulating. I think it would be safer to say that the findings of the study “suggest’ a link, certainly too early to be any firmer than this. Thanks again.

  3. Ekin

    I’m quite emphatetic but I stopped letting movies get to me, as I can’t get over the fact that they’re fake. That’s emphathy as well. So please take that into consideration.

  4. Derp

    I don’t react to scary movies. I can hardly watch any movie if I find a detail to be potentially inaccurate or out of context or character with the movie. Unless it’s a musical (because that’s my favorite genre), I don’t get scared at horror movies, I get bored. I don’t see a need for violent movies, but that doesn’t mean they “gross me out.” It simply means I know they are staged, I know the mechanics around how movies are made, and I have no reason to spend money on a movie that is someone’s fantasy. However, when I see a stage play, I *know* what techniques the actor is using to prepare for his role, how *he* is preparing, and how *he* responds to the audience (on stage and off). That’s still empathy.

Leave a Reply