With the progress of science and scientific methods, some old superstitions have faded away for not having an element of reality, while some others are still subjects of debate. The main question is how real superstitions are. Are they just a product of imagination having its roots in the ancient era or do they have any reasonable physical theories behind them?
In general, a superstition is defined as an irrational idea or belief originating from ignorance or fear of the unknown. Every superstition is somehow linked to hidden and unseen energy and force influenced by some objects or human rituals. Superstition in its broadest meanings also includes such subject issues as witchery, magic, or sorcery.
For example, from our early childhood, we have heard that anyone facing the passing of a black cat will eventually face bad luck. Another famous superstition is the fallacy of number 13. The number 13 is believed by many to result in unlucky events. Numerous reasons are cited to support the ideas, including:
Besides the above famous superstitions, there are many others, some of which are the following:
The misfortune of number 23 and the paranoia it has created. Although less know, number 23 is also a source of fear for the following coincidence:
Here are more examples:
Although none of these ideas has any ration behind this common belief, the idea is so deep-rooted that it has spread to other cultures and even non-religious people.
Interestingly, superstitions are not necessarily referring to something leading to a bad fate. For example, in many cultures, the crossing of fingers is believed to bring good luck. Such objects as horseshoes and rabbit’s feet, among many others, are commonly believed to bring good fortune. The other example is good luck attributed to number 7. This belief has many reasons behind it, including the occasional references to this number in the Bible.
But the fact is whether they are believed by many to result in a negative or positive fortune, none of them has any scientific support for their claim other than old fallacies that have been transferred from generation to generation. Yet, their psychological impact over thousands of years has been so profound that they are somehow recognized by the scientific community.
For example, despite its seemingly irrational idea, scientists have debated over the fear of number 13 and for now, it has been categorized as an actual phobia!
So much about baseless superstitions, but what about those superstitions that claim to have strong scientific support? The question may be paraphrased as follows, are there any scientific thoughts or theories that may indeed be the modern version of old superstitions in our age? The idea may seem somehow contradictory as scientific theories can be tested and either accepted or rejected by the scientists who work for a deeper understanding of the laws of nature.
For example, Quantum physics that is sometimes regarded as a link between science and superstition is a very well established field of science with testable and definite predictions exactly like Newton’s classical mechanics and Einstein’s theory of relativity.
Einstein’s theory of relativity made to predictions at odds with the classical view of time and space, i.e., time dilation and length contraction. However, both could be tested and it did not take too much time to verify the accuracy of predictions. So there was no room for any supernatural belief about them.
Yet, there is still some support for such ideas. Modern superstitions use modern science and modern physics for enhancing of nonscientific, or better to say, anti-scientific beliefs. Such ideas are fed from two tentacles, one stretching into the very old theosophical ideas of the Far East while the other extending to the heart of the science and technology of the West.
Although, there have been some attempts to mix quantum physics with fantasy stuff as proof of superstitions, yet none of these ideas seems to have gained scientific proof. It is true that quantum physics and quantum mechanics have suggested many unpredictable results, some of which being odd from our previous experience’s perspective, but the method of science has not changed at any point.
Science is modeling based, experimentation, and again refined modeling and refined experimentation until an acceptable theory is reached. Science has nothing to do with “supernatural” realities or superstitions. Those “superstitions” that receive scientific support, can no longer be regarded as superstitions and they should be categorized as phenomena with rational scientific interpretation.
View Comments
There were actually 12 apostles. But anyway, excellent article. Keep it up, mate.
I think the article contradicts itself a little. You say a superstition that is scientifically proven stops being a superstition and just becomes phenomena with rational scientific interpretation, but that implies that such a thing can happen. Something we don't understand and regard as superstition and the supernatural can eventually become understood and will then be considered scientific. So something seen as supernatural can be scientifically proven, and will then be relabeled, but that's just semantics. The point remains that a superstition can eventually be scientifically rationalized. The fact that its name gets changed doesn't really matter in the grand scope of things.