Quantum Theory Proves That Consciousness Moves to Another Universe After Death

consciousness parallel universeA book titled “Biocentrism: How Life and Consciousness Are the Keys to Understanding the Nature of the Universe“, published in the USA, has stirred up the Internet because of the notion that life does not end when the body dies and can last forever. The author of this publication, scientist Robert Lanza, has no doubts that this may be possible.

Beyond time and space

Lanza is an expert in regenerative medicine and scientific director at Advanced Cell Technology Company. While he is known for his extensive research on stem cells, he was also famous for several successful experiments on cloning endangered animal species.

But not so long ago, the scientist turned his attention to physics, quantum mechanics and astrophysics. This explosive mixture has given birth to the new theory of biocentrism, which the professor has been preaching ever since.

The theory implies that death simply does not exist. It is an illusion which arises in the minds of people. It exists because people identify themselves with their body. They believe that the body is going to perish, sooner or later, thinking that their consciousness will disappear too. In fact, consciousness exists outside of constraints of time and space. It is able to be anywhere: in the human body and outside of it. That fits well with the basic postulates of quantum mechanics, according to which a certain particle can be present anywhere and an event can happen in several, sometimes countless, ways.

Lanza believes that multiple universes can exist simultaneously. These universes contain multiple ways for possible scenarios to occur. In one universe, the body can be dead. And in another it continues to exist, absorbing consciousness which migrated to this universe.

This means that a dead person, while traveling through the ‘tunnel’, ends up in a similar world he or she once inhabited, but this time alive. And so on, infinitely.

Multiple worlds

multiverse parallel universesThis hope-instilling but extremely controversial theory by Lanza has many unwitting supporters – not just ‘mere mortals’ who want to live forever, but also some well-known scientists. These are physicists and astrophysicists who tend to agree with the existence of parallel worlds and who suggest the possibility of multiple universes, known as the Multiverse theory.

Science fiction writer H.G. Wells was the first to come up with this concept, which was proposed in his story “The Door in the Wall” in 1895. 62 years after it was published, the idea was developed by Hugh Everett in his graduate thesis at the Princeton University. It basically states that at any given moment the universe divides into countless similar instances. And the next moment, these “newborn” universes split in a similar way. You may be present in some of these worlds – you may be reading this article in one universe or watching TV in another.

The triggering factor for these multiplying worlds is our actions, explained Everett. When we make certain choices, one universe instantly splits into two different versions of outcomes.

In the 1980s, Andrei Linde, scientist from the Lebedev Physical Institute in Russia developed the theory of multiple universes. He is now a professor at Stanford University.

Linde explained: “Space consists of many inflating spheres, which give rise to similar spheres, and those, in turn, produce spheres in even greater numbers, and so on to infinity. In the universe, they are spaced apart. They are not aware of each other’s existence. But they represent parts of the same physical universe.

The fact that our universe is not alone is supported by data received from the Planck space telescope. Using the data, scientists created the most accurate map of the microwave background, the so-called cosmic microwave background radiation, which has remained since the inception of our universe. They also found that the universe has a lot of anomalies represented by black holes and extensive gaps.

Theoretical physicist Laura Mersini-Houghton from the North Carolina University argues that the anomalies of the microwave background exist due to the fact that our universe is influenced by other universes existing nearby. And holes and gaps are a direct result of attacks from neighboring universes.

Soul quanta

So, there is abundance of places or other universes where our soul could migrate after death, according to the theory of neo-biocentrism. But does the soul exist?

consciousness parallel universeProfessor Stuart Hameroff from the University of Arizona has no doubts about the existence of eternal soul. Last year, he announced that he has found evidence that consciousness does not perish after death.

According to Hameroff, the human brain is the perfect quantum computer, and the soul, or consciousness, is simply information stored at the quantum level. It can be transferred, following the death of the body; quantum information carried by consciousness merges with our universe and exists infinitely. In his turn, Lanza proves that the soul migrates to another universe. That is the main difference his theory has from the similar ones.

Sir Roger Penrose, a well-known British physicist and expert in mathematics from Oxford, supports this theory and claims to have found traces of contact with other universes. Together, the scientists are developing a quantum theory to explain the phenomenon of consciousness. They believe that they have found carriers of consciousness, the elements that accumulate information during life and “drain” consciousness somewhere else after death. These elements are located inside protein-based microtubules (neuronal microtubules), which previously have been attributed a simple role of reinforcement and transport channeling inside a living cell. Based on their structure, microtubules are best suited to function as carriers of quantum properties inside the brain. That is mainly because they are able to retain quantum states for a long time, meaning they can function as elements of a quantum computer.

© Copyright 2015 Learning Mind, all rights reserved. For permission to re-print this article contact us.        
The following two tabs change content below.
Anna LeMind

Anna LeMind

Anna is the owner and lead editor of the website Learning-mind.com. She is passionate about learning new things and reflecting on thought-provoking ideas. She writes about technology, science, psychology and other related topics. She is particularly interested in topics regarding introversion, consciousness and subconscious, perception, human mind's potential, as well as the nature of reality and the universe.
Anna LeMind

About Anna LeMind

Anna is the owner and lead editor of the website Learning-mind.com. She is passionate about learning new things and reflecting on thought-provoking ideas. She writes about technology, science, psychology and other related topics. She is particularly interested in topics regarding introversion, consciousness and subconscious, perception, human mind's potential, as well as the nature of reality and the universe.
Bookmark the permalink.

72 Comments

  1. Dear all,

    My Search from my childhood (Intuition at age 10 or below: Parallel consciousness called then as Parallelism), get a green signal, some others of this universe has similar understanding in their consciousness. The content seems to be true, however i am proceeding with my Search.

  2. The verse we exist in has only so many ways of organizing the finite number of particles. Once we die, all sense of time stops. There could be any number of gazillion of centuries before matter is organized that has the same combination of particles that existed in your previous life, stepping out of one verse into another instant oust from the passed person’s perspective. That scenario seems like it could only be true. In some verses, it may be possible to have the configurations of particles that model memories in previous lives, because if it can happen it will happen an infinite number of times given an infinite amount of time.

    • This is the exact theory I’ve tried many times to explain to people. Given an infinite amount of time, anything and everything can and will happen infinitely many times. Meaning we’ll all live this exact same life again, and we’ll live every possible slight variant, and wildly different variants. If we assume that our consciousness is simply dependent on the positioning of the atoms that make up our brain, body, whatever, then these atoms will arrange themselves in this exact organization again and again over infinite time.

      • omgpeopleunderstandthis

        EXACTLY! If the Universe has a beginning and an end, which scientists seem to think it does, then in fact, we should end up in some parallel universe after we die, with spacetime not being a variable when we get ‘transferred’.

      • I´ve Been Thinking About this a lot in the last few years!
        I Believe that Life is Just Like the Movie “Groundhog Day”. Although the story depicts a man living the same day over and over again, I think that in reality, we’re confined to this life and this era we’re living now, for all eternity, but with the ability to, after death, transfer all the Knowledge and experiences we lived in this Life, in this Universe. This is Life Number One. And I Believe this is The first One Because We’re Living in a Universe where our parents met each Other and therefore We were Born.
        I´ll Try to gather all the relevant information that I need in this Life, in Order to Have a Better One when I die. I Don’t want to get to know some People again, and I’ll definitely Avoid all the Mistakes that I’ve Made…
        The Only Thing that intrigues me in this theory of mine is The “Checkpoint after death”. Will I Wake Up with Seven Years Old in my Grandmother’s house? I’ll Only Know when I’ll die… :)

  3. So if the person died due to brain death this would not be applicable?

    • Every body dies. Mere cardiac arrest =/= death. Brain death is death. I think people associate death and life too much with the brain when other living things do so without what science identifies as a brain. Biorganic, sessile life seems all about generating & maintaining a small electric field, once the electric field can’t be maintained, life, as we can perceive it now, ends. They missed Edgar Cayce’s “Akashic Library.” Essentially the largest database ever.

    • Saying if the multiple universes are created by the different out cones of our actions and the actions around us.The person would simply slip into a multiverse were you have not died. Now my theory is that the brain would view this as trauma and erase the memories of death in order to smoothly slip into the person’s new life in another multiverse. Also since the transfer is based on the last choice we made, the person would not see anything different or out of the ordinary.

  4. Please read the Bhawat Geeta. Consciousness is explained at length. The Geeta is a few thousands years old!

  5. First it does not prove any such thing at present. But if Stephen Hawking’s string theory, multiverse theory, can be taken serious then why not a theory that says consciousness is not produced by the body alone and death might be an allusion. I mean ask yourself this question! Why would the natural world potentially create, if string theory is right, infinite numbers of earths with infinite copies of me doing infinite different things or the same thing forever? So is my other selves conscious? One would assume they are. How fantastical is Hawking’s theory and how some laugh at it today. Multiple Universes are the stuff of science fiction yet Hawking says they might be real and folks give it credence. Yet put a theory saying consciousness might be quantum and death an illusion and you get laughed out of the building. The one thing I’ve learned about science and Phycisist is they choose to believe whom they want. In reality they don’t know anything for sure about the quantum world and they do formulas that say this might be or that might be. If I die and just poof out of existence then Stephen Hawking’s multiverse was not true and will be just the missives of a man who thinks to much of himself. There is absolutely no natural reason to have multiverses and endless copies of me unless consciousness was inter dimensional. In fact the more I think about string theory the more ridiculous it sounds. So if Stephen Hawking can get someone to take his ridiculous postulations to heart then why not Robert Lanza. Good Night.

  6. I´ve Been Thinking About this a lot in the last few years! I Believe that Life is Just Like the Movie “Groundhog Day”. Although it depicts a man living the same day over and over again, I think that in reality, we’re confined to this life and this era we’re living now, for all eternity, but with the ability to, after death, transfer all the Knowledge and experiences we lived in this Life, in This Universe, to another One. Robert Lanza States that After Death, we’ll Wake Up just Like Any Other day.

    I Believe This is Life Number One. And this is The first One Because We’re Living in a Universe where our parents met each Other and therefore We were Born.
    So my Goal is to gather all the relevant information that I need in this Life, in Order to Have a Better One when I’ll die. I Don’t want to get to know some People again, and I’ll definitely Avoid all the Mistakes that I’ve done… The Only Thing that intrigues me in this theory of mine is “The Checkpoint after death”.
    Will I Wake Up with Seven Years Old in my Grandmother’s house?
    Greetings from Portugal!

  7. Many many valid points, all with their own credit and believable support, but the one thing that I don’t see is progression…
    Everything we know to exist at this stage has some form of progression,
    Big bang, gas closeness to sins and planets, suns pump our gases and elements, form more planets. In our case proteins developed into complex proteins, caveman (sorry about the skip but I think you get the first) things improve or advance (for good or bad). Society, industrialisation and yada yada.
    But then what….
    What if the multiverse is right and each of our consciousness is a part of the development and when we pass on, it generates another phase of development, with our own acquired interests and knowledge as the base for another chain of development.
    So if I were intrigued by magnetism, my consciousness passes to a universe that has learnt to develope a society based on that as a primary source, rather than fossil fuels and electricity?
    Every known step in evolution leads to an adapted existence, so why wouldn’t death result in an adapted(possibly improved) consciousness.
    Not every step in evolution was a winner, yet life evolved.
    So what if everyone is right.
    We are all in our individual existence and at the same time in every one we knows.
    Perhaps we are proof of multiverses interactions and Reliance upon each other?

  8. So where was my consciousness before it inhabited my body?

    • Your Consciousness Was Born With You. It Didn’t Existed Before You…
      You Are Living The First Life of Your Immortal Existence. :)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Enter the text from the image below