Quantum Theory Proves That Consciousness Moves to Another Universe After Death

consciousness parallel universeA book titled “Biocentrism: How Life and Consciousness Are the Keys to Understanding the Nature of the Universe“, published in the USA, has stirred up the Internet because of the notion that life does not end when the body dies and can last forever. The author of this publication, scientist Robert Lanza, has no doubts that this may be possible.

Beyond time and space

Lanza is an expert in regenerative medicine and scientific director at Advanced Cell Technology Company. While he is known for his extensive research on stem cells, he was also famous for several successful experiments on cloning endangered animal species.

But not so long ago, the scientist turned his attention to physics, quantum mechanics and astrophysics. This explosive mixture has given birth to the new theory of biocentrism, which the professor has been preaching ever since.

The theory implies that death simply does not exist. It is an illusion which arises in the minds of people. It exists because people identify themselves with their body. They believe that the body is going to perish, sooner or later, thinking that their consciousness will disappear too. In fact, consciousness exists outside of constraints of time and space. It is able to be anywhere: in the human body and outside of it. That fits well with the basic postulates of quantum mechanics, according to which a certain particle can be present anywhere and an event can happen in several, sometimes countless, ways.

Lanza believes that multiple universes can exist simultaneously. These universes contain multiple ways for possible scenarios to occur. In one universe, the body can be dead. And in another it continues to exist, absorbing consciousness which migrated to this universe.

This means that a dead person, while traveling through the ‘tunnel’, ends up in a similar world he or she once inhabited, but this time alive. And so on, infinitely.

Multiple worlds

multiverse parallel universesThis hope-instilling but extremely controversial theory by Lanza has many unwitting supporters – not just ‘mere mortals’ who want to live forever, but also some well-known scientists. These are physicists and astrophysicists who tend to agree with the existence of parallel worlds and who suggest the possibility of multiple universes, known as the Multiverse theory.

Science fiction writer H.G. Wells was the first to come up with this concept, which was proposed in his story “The Door in the Wall” in 1895. 62 years after it was published, the idea was developed by Hugh Everett in his graduate thesis at the Princeton University. It basically states that at any given moment the universe divides into countless similar instances. And the next moment, these “newborn” universes split in a similar way. You may be present in some of these worlds – you may be reading this article in one universe or watching TV in another.

The triggering factor for these multiplying worlds is our actions, explained Everett. When we make certain choices, one universe instantly splits into two different versions of outcomes.

In the 1980s, Andrei Linde, scientist from the Lebedev Physical Institute in Russia developed the theory of multiple universes. He is now a professor at Stanford University.

Linde explained: “Space consists of many inflating spheres, which give rise to similar spheres, and those, in turn, produce spheres in even greater numbers, and so on to infinity. In the universe, they are spaced apart. They are not aware of each other’s existence. But they represent parts of the same physical universe.

The fact that our universe is not alone is supported by data received from the Planck space telescope. Using the data, scientists created the most accurate map of the microwave background, the so-called cosmic microwave background radiation, which has remained since the inception of our universe. They also found that the universe has a lot of anomalies represented by black holes and extensive gaps.

Theoretical physicist Laura Mersini-Houghton from the North Carolina University argues that the anomalies of the microwave background exist due to the fact that our universe is influenced by other universes existing nearby. And holes and gaps are a direct result of attacks from neighboring universes.

Soul quanta

So, there is abundance of places or other universes where our soul could migrate after death, according to the theory of neo-biocentrism. But does the soul exist?

consciousness parallel universeProfessor Stuart Hameroff from the University of Arizona has no doubts about the existence of eternal soul. Last year, he announced that he has found evidence that consciousness does not perish after death.

According to Hameroff, the human brain is the perfect quantum computer, and the soul, or consciousness, is simply information stored at the quantum level. It can be transferred, following the death of the body; quantum information carried by consciousness merges with our universe and exists infinitely. In his turn, Lanza proves that the soul migrates to another universe. That is the main difference his theory has from the similar ones.

Sir Roger Penrose, a well-known British physicist and expert in mathematics from Oxford, supports this theory and claims to have found traces of contact with other universes. Together, the scientists are developing a quantum theory to explain the phenomenon of consciousness. They believe that they have found carriers of consciousness, the elements that accumulate information during life and “drain” consciousness somewhere else after death. These elements are located inside protein-based microtubules (neuronal microtubules), which previously have been attributed a simple role of reinforcement and transport channeling inside a living cell. Based on their structure, microtubules are best suited to function as carriers of quantum properties inside the brain. That is mainly because they are able to retain quantum states for a long time, meaning they can function as elements of a quantum computer.

The following two tabs change content below.
Anna LeMind

Anna LeMind

Anna is the owner and lead editor of the website Learning-mind.com. She is passionate about learning new things and reflecting on thought-provoking ideas. She writes about technology, science, psychology and other related topics. She is particularly interested in topics concerning consciousness and subconscious, perception, human mind's potential, as well as the nature of reality and the universe.
Anna LeMind

About Anna LeMind

Anna is the owner and lead editor of the website Learning-mind.com. She is passionate about learning new things and reflecting on thought-provoking ideas. She writes about technology, science, psychology and other related topics. She is particularly interested in topics concerning consciousness and subconscious, perception, human mind's potential, as well as the nature of reality and the universe.
Bookmark the permalink.

35 Comments

  1. THEORIES do not prove anything. A THEORY predics something that is either CONFIRMED or REFUTED by EXPERIMENT – by multiple investigators, more than once, is repeatable over and over again. Where is the experimental result that cofirms this prediction??

    What someone believes, whomever they are, does NOT compose a theory. A THEORY has assumptions, process descriptions (preferably mathematical, so effects they can be measured), and predicted conditions wich can be seen (and hopefully measured) by EXPERIMENT.

    • There are extensive mathematical evidence pointing to the theories mentioned here. There are labs and entire university departments experimenting in projects related to consciousness, producing appealing evidence of what is said here. Obviously this article is no place for that type of discussion but that does not implies there is no hard fact science behind. As always, science fundamentalist assault any new idea until eventually the new ideas became the new paradigm. Is a normal process…

    • I see you are similar to president Obama. You say things that have no relevance to the topic. We all know what a hypothesis is genius. Actually everybody learns these things in 7th grade. They are talking about multiple scientists (that’s plural) and physicists having proof to support their claims. And every piece of proof is a piece of the puzzle. When you put the puzzle prices together it makes a whole picture. PROOF of anythings existence is not a hypothesis. The theory is what they all mean.

    • Listen I love science but understand very little of it. It seems when it comes to Quantum Mechanics and other strange Physics one can theorize anything. At times I feel the human being is indeed very unique then at times I say well we murder and kill without pity or remorse so in that sense were worse than animals. But I digress. Perhaps it’s the hope within me that ultimately sees human beings different. No Animal seemingly has our high level of consciousness. No Animal seemingly even contemplates life after death. So why do we? Is the answer simply evolution? If so how did we get so cursed? Much better to live with only food, sex, predator avoidance and play on our mind than to be burdened with all this other stuff. Yet if evolution is the answer we are indeed the most cursed of all animal species. So in short I choose to believe that Quantum Conscience is a real possibility. I in short don’t think were a high conscience creature by accident. Perhaps it’s not a God thing but a universe thing. Perhaps on some level they are high conscience atoms, or even smaller high conscience particles that we can’t see or measure currently. Perhaps those high conscience particles that somehow gravitate to large complex brains! I close by saying this to all those who think we die and go to non-existence. When I was born into this world my conscience came from nothing and when I die it will go into nothing then perhaps I can once again be reborn from nothing. It happened at least once for all of us why not again. Good Day.

  2. Do we trancend to this other universe/world as we left this one. I mean if i die here now at 40 years old then would i present in the next world at 40?

    We can clearly remember being children or seeing children being born in this life and we watch them grow…But if i came to “this” life as a baby and my mum carried me for 9 months then surely the life i had before i got here would have seen me die presumably as an adult.
    That would pressume we simply dont trancsend to “Other” universes or awake in new realities after death.
    If i started as a baby in this life but died an adult in my previous life then i would have in effect have been reincarnated and that cycle would/should continue life after life…No??

    This article seems to suggest we may simply die but wake up in another reality where we are not dead and carry on as normal where we left off. If thats the case then stepping through this portal would assume we still be 40 years old (or whatever age death occurred) So how can we remember childhood?
    All a bit ridiculous really

    • You are every single one of those realities

    • I’ve died multiple times. Trauma related events trigger flashbacks of other lives, past present, and future in other universes. I can see the forks and splits everyday. Meditation helps me connect, too, allowing me to “stick” events, people, objects, etc. in the universe I want to stay in. I can manipulate my past, present, future in parallel and congruently. Quantum playground.

  3. Intresting article but it is still 90% speculation with some very minor evidence (small ammounts of evidence but not enough to prove the theory) I think that this could be pissible but they actualy need to prove the multiverse theory before jumping to conclusions based on theories. Plus nobody has yet been able to transfer the soul or find what generates the soul in the body.

    I think it’s safer to say the chonchessness shuts down like a computer OS. Proabably still in the storage but not accessible after the body and brain dies. I honestly don’t believe in the heavan/hell idea. I believe that is just a way to controll people who are not smart enough (werent tought morals) to know about moral values on their own then people who are tought that pass these teachings to their kids and so on. That’s why society is so adapted to religious controll as opposed to being dedicated to science. They are just afraid of what would happen to the ‘soul’ after death.

  4. This may be all well and good if you were lucky enough to be born with a healthy body and mind and have experienced a relatively happy life, (so obviously, you’d want this to continue indefinitely in some parallel universe). But what about those who’ve experienced a truly awful existence, either as victims of cruelty, natural disaster or physical and mentall illness ? I doubt that any of these victims, both human and nonhuman, would really want a repetition of their hellish ordeal. That’s the worst case of “Groundhog Day” I’ve ever heard of and makes the idea of Death quite reassuring by comparison. And what about patients with brain damage or physical deformity – do they continue to exist in these parallel worlds in the same condition they left this one ? What a terrifying concept ! As the saying goes, be careful what you wish for, (life after death), as it might come true !

  5. The problem supporting or refuting the argument of the multi-verse is one of limited intelligence of a human being. Logic and reasoning is a premise we all(most)understand, but other universal tools may exist in the universe beyond our comprehension which is biased by our human teachings. I don’t believe in heaven/hell either, but immortality may be possible; I have belief that whatever our limited intellect can imagine is possible. The idea that the present physical life, being high or low quality may be irrelevant and not an expectation in an afterlife.
    (my speculation) I actually think it is possible that an epiphany is a signal from a multiverse sent to a mortal for improvement in culture. Those classified as visionary may be identified as the receivers able/willing to execute the idea.

  6. This IS RIDICULOUS! Every one is going to an extreme, we’re gonna live forever or it’s all a load of baloney! Remain neutral particularly in scientific matters until it is either proved or disproved

  7. We assume that the teachings we have received through our lives are true. BUT LOOK AT QUANTUM PHYSICS! Things exist everywhere at once, the world is made of MULTI-DIMENSIONAL STRINGS OF ENERGY! Is it really so strange espicially in matters of Astrophysics to consider un induced, natural immortality and preservation of consciousness through parallaxes. I mean come on, it’s not like it’s weirder than what we already know.

    • I think the cornerstone of this argument is the double-slit experiment. It changes everything. By observing an event we directly influence it. We change it. Reality is not the same if we do not observe it. Robert Lanza hypothesizes that in order for reality to exist we MUST exist and that without us there is no universe and therefore we will always exist. The universe would cease to exist if we simply no longer existed.

  8. “Theories do not prove anything” So Darwin’s Theory of Evolution by the same yardstick is a piece of garbage taught in schools making people believe something which is not there. Some believe “all sciences will end in religion”. The scientific progress made by “special specie” used the wonderful gift called “brain” but the question is where did this brain come from with its magical powers compared to other billions of species living side by side?

  9. I’ve been considering parallel worlds, occupying the same space but they exist on different planes; typical 2 sides of the coin analogy. I’ve had numerous occurrences in my dreams (Don’t disregard with the neurology and psychology of dreams, consideration of anything, no matter how malleable is the mindset of the ponderous and free-thinkers.) where I’ve woke up in environments that show distinct similarities with the environment I’ve experienced in my lifetime yet they differ in subtle ways; one example being I had been dreaming but woke up in my friend’s room, from what I can recall the plot was it was after a party in our local city, I had been walking over people who had drunk themselves into deficiency. The room was orange which I knew wasn’t the case, from my recollection her room was green. She requested corn flakes, I responded with “I thought you didn’t like cornflakes?” Simple, structured conversation. Walking down the stairs I attempted to recall the crazy night I had but there was issues in my ability to recall what I had done. As the answer was in my reach I had faded out of that reality (I assumed it was correctional, like there was some bio-recognition that assimilated with consciousness, myself experiencing that reality was just an error that had to be corrected. After that I returned to my body and since I had a very vivid memory of what exactly happened the idea has been thought-provoking material.

    It’s evident in such varying degrees that the conclusion I’ve made (which is there are other realities that do exist), it’s unscientific, seemingly no methodology to validate this observation and as a product, rendered abstract and subjective; not scientific in any degree.

    I’m aware thr idea is fallacious in nature as a situation that explains everything coherently (What I’ve posited some dream-like states are- experiencing alternate realities) yet has no evidence acting as a premise is fallacious, but I can not completely erase the idea from my mind. I don’t care if it sounds crazy, illogical, irrational and any other belittling insult you consider my experience to be. I cannot know for sure, I doubt I’ll come to an adequate conclusion anytime soon. What was considered dumb-founded, nonsensical theories are now regarded as the paradigm of modern science, such as darwninism being a widely accepted foundation for what biology is contingent on; evolution. Each cell, organism, protein all having an intrinsic and evolutionary function.

    Obviously, mine isn’t in great depth such as biology. Just to avoid dismiss, I’ve experienced multiple dreams like the one above, I just used this one as an example.
    Quantum mechanics would be suggestible that my experience could be valid if consciousness was put in terms of sub-atomic particles. Quantum entanglement would also suggest there could be a connection with yourself between other planes, a sea of information and knowledge that are interwoven ans transferable.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Enter the text from the image below
 

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>