This 700,000-year-old Human Skull Challenges the Prevailing Theory of Human Evolution

///This 700,000-year-old Human Skull Challenges the Prevailing Theory of Human Evolution

700,000-year-old Human Skull

The “Petralona man”, or “Archanthropus of Petralona”, is a 700,000-year-old human skull discovered in 1959. Since then, scientists have been trying to trace this skull’s origin, a process that has caused considerable controversy.

The skull, indicating the oldest human “europeoid” (presenting European traits), was embedded in a cave’s wall in Petralona, near Chalkidiki in Northern Greece. The cave, rich in stalactites and stalagmites, was accidentally located by a shepherd. Dr. Aris Poulianos, an expert anthropologist, member of the UNESCO’s International Union of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences and founder of the Anthropological Association of Greece, was assigned a research on the cave and skull.

Before that, Dr. Poulianos was already known for his thesis on “The origin of the Greeks. His thesis was based on craniological and anthropometrical studies of Modern Greek populations, which proved that modern Greeks are related to ancient Greeks and that they are not the descendants of Slavic nations. After the extensive study on the 700,000-year-old skull, he concluded that the “Petralona man” was not connected to the species that came out of Africa. His arguments were mainly based on the skull’s almost perfect orthography, the shape of its dental arch, and the occipital bone construction. According to the “Out of Africa” theory, “anatomically modern humans” known as “Homo sapiens” originated in Africa between 200,000 and 100,000 years ago before spreading to the rest of the world. This theory was related to the fact that most prehistoric fossils were found in Africa.

In 1964, two German researchers, anthropologist E. Breitinger and paleontologist O. Sickenberg, who were invited to Greece, suggested that the skull was actually 50,000 years old, thus rejecting Dr. Poulianos’ theory. Moreover, Breitinger claimed that the skull belonged to the “first African out of Africa”. A few years later, in 1971, US Archaeology magazine confirmed Poulianos’ statement. According to the scientific magazine, the existence of a cave dating back more than 700,000 years and human presence in almost every geological layer were ascertained. Additionally, the magazine affirmed that human presence became evident from the discovery of Paleolithic tools of the same age and the most ancient traces of fire that was ever lit by human hand. The research continued from 1975 to 1983, when the excavation stopped and findings remained inaccessible to study until 1997.

Today, 50 years after the discovery of the “Petralona man”, modern methods of absolute chronology confirm Dr. Poulianos’ theory. Most academics believe that the skull belongs to an archaic hominid with strong European traits and characteristics of Homo erectus, Neanderthals and sapiens, but they distinguish it from all these species. This incredible discovery raises new questions on human evolution, and certainly challenges the “Out of Africa” theory.



Copyright © 2019 Learning Mind. All rights reserved. For permission to reprint, contact us.
By |2018-08-16T12:55:12+00:00May 4th, 2015|Categories: History & Archaeology, Uncommon Science|Tags: , , |5 Comments

About the Author:

I am a History major, who loves art, travelling and nature. Photography and music make my life exciting. I love learning new languages and cultures. Over the past 5 years, I have been working as a translator and writer.


  1. Johannes Rudbeck May 16, 2015 at 1:19 am - Reply

    What is actually challenging with this find? Homo Erectus is believed to have been around for 2 million years. Even if there was a major spread from Africa at one time certainly some homo sapiens sapiens migrated earlier. That a mix of neanderthal and sapiens and others occurred is also not new. Finding a humanoid with a probability of being erectus, neander, sapiens or a mix as old as 700k years or as it is believed in this case 70k-240k doesn’t seem to be revolutionary at all?

    • Newguy May 16, 2015 at 9:50 am - Reply

      Belief is not fact!!

  2. Driveways Essex May 16, 2015 at 11:35 am - Reply

    Very interesting post, thanks for sharing!!

  3. KEVIN November 17, 2016 at 10:27 pm - Reply

    We believe this skull is as old as the professor and the top Archaelogical department state it is.
    The Anti-Biblical Scientific community just DO Not like anything that go against their accepted norms and creeds. Everyone has to believe what they have said as the final word on how the human race was started.
    With their denials and stopping people in their ancient tracks so to speak, to research the skull even further, they are just showing they are covering up and don’t want the true facts to be told to the public.

  4. Heimlich Abedi November 21, 2017 at 3:39 am - Reply

    Anthropology has no solid path of human evolution small mutations over a long period won’t cause the animal to survive since many genes determines large differences between animals. Each species has a different origin from one another

Leave A Comment